Subscribe via Feed
, Oct 11, 2010 7:10:12 AM
4 responses to XPages Discussion App, Performance Three Times Better
Erik Brooks, October 11, 2010 6:20 PM
Ah, I got confused by the line Jeremy pointed out. I think you're right, both templates were running on 8.5.2.
Then in *that* case I'd be curious to see the 7.0.x template on 8.5.2 vs. on 7.0.3. That difference should be remarkable by itself based on what I'm seeing.
And if I really could scratch my itches I'd like to see 8.5.2 running the 8.5.2 template, with ODS43 vs. ODS51. :-D
Paul Hannan, October 11, 2010 2:04 PM
I think both apps were run on the one 852 Domino server. No?
Jeremy Hodge, October 11, 2010 1:57 PM
From the report it looks like a Domino 8.5.2 server was used to test both the 7.x template and the 8.5.2 template ... so its a true test of a different in performance between the XPages design and the "classic" design on the same server ...
From the report: "A single Lotus Domino server 8.5.2 was used to test and compare the performance of the classic and the XPages discussion databases."
I think the confusing like is that when it says they used the R7.x Template from Domino Release 7 .. which just stated the origin of the template, not the server used.
Erik Brooks, October 11, 2010 12:58 PM
Actually you've got one big problem with this comparison - you're running the 7.0.x template on a 7.0.x server, right? So this is really a comparison of a new Domino version AND a new discussion template against an older version of both.
You obviously can't run the 8.5.2 discussion template on 7.0.x, but I'd like to see how the 8.5.2 server performs running the 7.0.x discussion template. That'd show you a true test of Domino (not template) performance differences between 7.0.x and 8.5.2.. which I still think would be significant.